Nineteenth Century Fashion: New Fashion for the Great Exhibition

 In July 1851 it was reported that young ladies in Harrogate had been seen in Bloomer costume. Later that summer a lady and her daughter were spotted in London dressed in baggy trousers and waistcoats. They were surrounded by a mob and when they could stand the derision of the mob no longer they escaped in a cab. Such attire began to appear in several cities in the United Kingdom. In each instance the women wore variations on an outfit consisting of a belted knee length tunic and pantaloons gathered at the ankle known as “Bloomer” costume. The name was derived from the American journalist named Amelia Bloomer although it would be several more years before the words would be applied to the clothing itself.

The outfits were welcomed by some as a more practical alternative to full skirts that could trip the wearer up or be dragged along in the mud and the whalebone corsets that were tight and frequently uncomfortable. For all its pragmatism the style of dress provoked outrage and this was not what Amelia Bloomer expected. The original call to a more practical form of clothing had appeared in the Lily. The Lily  was a New York Newspaper that was run by Amelia Bloomer and devoted to the interests of women. The idea was to develop a form of clothing that would be more suitable for women carrying children or lighted candles.

During the summer of 1851 supporters and satirists grappled with the effects of allowing women to wear trousers in public. A play appeared, a farce entitled “Bloomerism or the follies of the day” by John Henry Nightingale -this appealed to some people including Charles Dickens whilst comic songs such as Henry Abraham’s “I want to be a Bloomer” was enjoyed by others. Those opposed to the new style of dress regarded the attire as a type of cross dressing. An article in The Times referred to it as “aggression.. most daringly manifested” and a form of social disorder. Many cartoons were published in which women were depicted as bossing their husbands around.

The Bloomer attire would be regarded as provocatively eccentric for many more years to come. In 1876 the New York Times reported a “curious nervous disorder peculiar to women” of which the most visible symptom was “an abnormal and unconquerable thirst for trousers”. Further problems developed because Bloomers were regarded as an import from North America and whilst it was acceptable for a woman to wear fashions from Paris, innovative clothing from New York was considered more dubious.. Gradually the controversy assuaged and trousers became a more acceptable form of clothing for women. In just one hundred and seventy years trousers for women have changed from being revolutionary and controversial garments into clothing that most women have in their wardrobes. Can you think of other household items have undergone such a radical shift in their use?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Oxford Movement and The Gorham Judgment of 1850

The Gothic Revival in the nineteenth century: Early work by A.W.N. Pugin

A.W.N. Pugin “Improving the taste of young England”