Nineteenth Century England: The Order of Deaconess

 

The first Anglican sisterhood was founded in 1845 (The sisterhood of the Holy Cross, near to Regent’s Park in London) and this ignited the debate within the Church of England about what form any involvement of women in ministry might take. In the 1850a support for the restoration of the Order of Deaconesses began to grow as the need for assistance for clergy ministering in large urban settings increased with industrialisation. The potential of a dedicated women’s order within the Church of England was recognised after observation of such orders which were successful in continental Europe. The institution in Kaiserwerth in Germany in particular was influential in the development of the order in England. It was a Lutheran foundation, started in 1833 to train women for charitable and religious works. Famous English women such as Elizabeth Fry and Florence Nightingale received some of their training there. In 1861 the North London Deaconess Institution was set up with Elizabeth Ferard as the chief sister. It changed its name to the London Diocesan Deaconess Institution in 1868. The activities of the Deaconesses involved basic nursing and teaching children, always within a parish situation.


Controversies arose in the distinction of the deaconesses from religious orders and from male ordained deacons and priests. The deaconesses were ordained through episcopal laying on of hands but in order to prevent them from being in the same office as a deacon (who was male) they were required tin their vows to “set aside all unwomanly usurpation of authority in the Church”. In contrast to male deacons, the deaconesses were not permitted to promise an open ended commitment to their order. The Bishop would ask them “Inasmuch as this office is not to be lightly undertaken or relinquished is it your present purpose to continue in it for the space of five years at the least?” To which the candidate would would reply “I purpose to do so by the help of God”.


The order became a dual vocational one: some who were called to community life could live in a deaconess institution whilst others could remain in their own household situation. Both categories remained under the authority of the chaplain of the order who was always a clergyman, married and in priest’s orders. Within the parish they were required not to contradict or disobey the parish priest with whom they served.


A different model of deaconess ministry emerged through the ministry of Isabella Gilmore who established the Rochester Diocesan Deaconess Institution in the late 1880s. This was entirely parochially based without a community option and supported by the Bishop who favoured a low church approach of Bible classes and prayer meetings among women parishioners that could be led by deaconesses. The approach of Isabella Gilmore differed from that of Elizabeth Ferard in that for the Gilmore model ministry took place among women (in particular) who were of limited financial resource and often lived in impoverished conditions in slums. Elizabeth Ferard’s model with its focus on community life, did not permit the deaconesses to have an extensive ministry to those who were not of a similar social and financial status to themselves.


In both categories the effect was the same: the desire for women to minister within the Church of England was established and strengthened. The Deaconess movement paved the way for the first ordinations of women to the diaconate and then as presbyters in the late twentieth century and the consecration of women Bishops in the early twenty first century. This reveals a century and half of women’s ministry in the Church of England, that has changed its character hugely. What will the next century bring do you think?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Oxford Movement and The Gorham Judgment of 1850

The Gothic Revival in the nineteenth century: Early work by A.W.N. Pugin

A.W.N. Pugin “Improving the taste of young England”